Looking Back…

January 5, 2020

As the decade clicked over* and we could finally start referring to a decade with a sensible name (no more ‘naughties’ or ‘teens’), I noticed a lot of people on Twitter in the #writingcommunity were posting their achievements. Of course, with no achievements at all, I was pleased for them, but could easily ignore the trend to share.

And then I got to thinking about what had I actually managed to do since 2010?

So, I compiled a tweet, I was surprised, and so, I have decided to expand upon it here:

Nothing happened from a writing/getting published point-of-view until 2012.

In June 2012 I won a competition run by Biting Dog Press, Science in Fiction, for a while my story was available to read, but the post has gone and Biting Dog don’t seem to have updated their website for sometime (2014 according to the copyright notice, so I’m unlikely to take them up on their prize, a free editorial of a novel).

In July 2012, I had my first piece of flash fiction published on the Paragraph Planet website:

1st piece of flash fiction published on Paragraph Planet website







I would go on to have another 60 Paragraphs published on that site, the last sneaking in just three days before the end of 2019:

Final piece of flash fiction published in 2019







Also in 2012, in November, I had a short story, Baby Babble, included in the Fantastic Books Publishing anthology, Fusion.

Finally, in December 2012, WordWatchers released their own Anthology, Out of Time, and I had a story, We are the Stranded, included in that.

2012 was a really good year.

I continued to have stories published on Paragraph Planet throughout 2013 (nine to be precise) and 2014 (eight). Also in 2014 I had two pieces of flash fiction included in the charity anthology, Ten Deadly Tales.

2015 came and went and I managed to get almost one story a month onto Paragraph Planet (eleven in total).

In 2016, two more anthologies from Fantastic Books Publishing, were released, Synthesis, and this one included two of my stories, All in the Mind  and The House and 666which included my ‘Highly Commended’ story, Headhunted.

In November 2017, the Role-Playing Game, Elite Encounters, by Dave ‘Selezen Lake’ Hughes was released and included five pieces of flash fiction written by me to act as chapter introductions/scene setters. As Elite Encounters was an officially Licensed product from Frontier Developments it’s a good feeling to finally have something that is part of the official material of a game that I have loved since 1985.

2017 was also an ‘interesting’ year for me, having finished my novel in March that year and expecting to crack on with the edits post-critique from the wonderful writers in WordWatchers, I hit a wall in my writing. In fact, I stopped writing almost completely. I was finally diagnosed with depression in November 2017 and despite counselling and medical intervention, I didn’t start writing again until the end of January 2018.

In January 2018 I wrote the short story, Elemental Sacrifice, at the annual WordWatchers Writers Retreat. Although the story wouldn’t be published until July 2019, in the anthology, The Forge: Fire and Ice, in July 2019, its journey began there, and so did my slow and steady recovery from the worst of my depression.

Also in 2018, I had a piece of flash fiction accepted into a new Science Fiction magazine called, The Martian Magazine, but unfortunately that magazine never made it to publication. I did however, actually manage to get paid in 2018, a whole $10, for a story that appeared in the anthology, ChronosThis is the first time I’ve been paid for anything I’ve written in a very long time (pun intended).

Which brings us to 2019. As mentioned already, The Forge: Fire and Ice was released during this year. I managed to have four pieces published on Paragraph Planet, but that’s OK, I was actually, finally, concentrating on getting my novel rewritten, which I’m very pleased to say I managed. Indeed, it is currently with the rest of WordWatchers and a few Beta Readers even as I type this. Its critique is just a few weeks away.

So actually, looking back, 2010 to 2019 hasn’t been too bad from a writing point-of-view, I’m certainly not giving up the day job, but that’s OK, I really like my day job (for the most part). As for 2020 and going forward, well, I plan to release my novel come what may. I’m going to take a tentative stab at offering it to a few people I’ve met in the Industry along the way, I’ll show it to the excellent guys at Fantastic Books, but if there’s no takers, I’m happy with it enough now, and confident enough in my own writing, to self-publish.

It will be interesting to revisit this log in a year’s time to see if I held myself to the above commitment…

I guess that just leaves me to wish you all the very best in 2020, whatever targets you’ve set yourself, large or small, I hope you achieve them.


* for the pedants – technically the next decade doesn’t begin until 2021, but we’ve lost that fight…

John Hoggard

Beyond Belief: Fact or Fiction

November 6, 2019

I’m a tad worried that I may now be on every international watch list, known to mankind.

Let’s start with the facts:

Secret Service SUV

Whilst editing an action scene involving a Hummer – I love Hummers. Mean looking cars, veritable, vehicular beasts that roar – I needed to know what its bumper was made from. I searched the internet, only to discover that the Hummer had actually ceased production ten years ago. My scene was modern day and the individuals involved would drive something more recent. Picturing those big black SUVs, you see in many a Hollywood action-thriller, I searched again, this time enquiring as the make and model of the SUVs driven by the secret service.

Yes, I know what you’re going to say, but hey, smarty-pants, hindsight’s a wonderful thing.

Several sites later, I ironically settled on leaving it generic – it’s now nothing more than a black SUV.

At night, I usually leave my laptop in sleep mode, so that upon opening, it springs to life but when I returned to it the next morning, I was met with a black screen. I tapped a few times, checked the power cable and feared the worst. Rebooting it flagged a report from Apple informing me that due to an ‘Unauthorised access attempt,’ my security software had shut down for protection. I checked the scan reports but there was no evidence of this, nor anything quarantined. I pulled up the search history from the night before, in a bid to ascertain which of those sites might have triggered this alert but eerily every site relating to that previous night’s specific search had disappeared.

The plot thickens…

I live in the countryside, and that night, as I walked the dogs, I noticed three drones in the sky. It’s not that uncommon to see the odd one out here at night, but three at once, definitely is. Even more unusual is to be pursued by one. It tracked me as I left my house in pitch-black darkness, all the way down our country lane, and back. Childishly perhaps, just as I re-entered my house, I offered it a single-fingered goodnight. Nothing more than it deserved. I went to bed and thought nothing more of it.

Until that was, the next morning…

UAV by ZullyC3P
CC-BY-SA 4.0

When my slightly freaked-out mother phoned to tell me, she thought she’d been followed home by a drone after leaving our house. She’d come for supper and had left just before I’d taken our dogs out and so, important to note, was oblivious to any of the events above. She’d noticed the drone when getting into her car and was then decidedly alarmed to see it still lurking above her when she reached her own house.

Coincidence or not? We may never know. As writers, we spend an inordinate amount of time in our over-imaginative minds, but I like to think I’m an intelligent woman and I’m definitely not a conspiracy theorist. However, in this instance, I think the dots do join, at the very least, to form a very bold question mark.

Which brings me to fiction:

This got me thinking. I’d not done anything wrong and I had nothing to hide but it still felt a tad sinister. So, if not the internet, how, or where, as unpublished, debut authors, should we go to research novels potentially involving sensitive data, people, places, and or events? Clearly, common sense should prevail but that doesn’t always get you the answers you seek. Needless to say, my library doesn’t stock books on the kind of topics I need.

If I were a best-selling author of international renown, I have no doubt that doors would be opened, the moment I knocked, but as an unknown, aspiring author, there have been times in my writing, when I don’t even know which doors I should be knocking on, let alone how to open them.

My teen protagonist has been raised in a military community, trained by ex-special ops personnel and seriously knows his stuff. How else therefore, can I ensure this makes for credible reading, other than to really do my homework in and around the subject matter?

Alas, if the powers that be, in their quest for the truth, wish to dig deeper still, they may be even more alarmed. For not only have I researched how to bring down a helicopter (make and model specific), as well as various forms of military weaponry, their uses, assembly and operation, but also how to build a bomb, truth be told, several different types of bomb and indeed, how to trigger them… Yes, this time, you don’t even need to say it… I’m an idiot, but my sole intention in conducting this type of research, has only ever been, is, and will continue to be, the achievement of fictional credibility.

Up until now, naïvely or otherwise, I’ve thoroughly enjoyed this process. I don’t have a military background, nor do any of my relatives or close friends. Thus, my research has opened my eyes to a world that exists far beyond my own. They say new authors should write about what they know but let’s face it, the highs and lows of Human Resources in corporate telecoms, is hardly the stuff of teenage fantasy.

What then, is the moral of this story? Beware the perils of writing? Be careful what you write, or indeed, how you research it? I don’t know. Take away from it what you will but the issue here is not about Big Brother, it’s about writing.

As writers, we write the books we want to read. For a truly, satisfying reader experience, it must feel credible, whatever the subject matter. Readers are astute beings. They expect nothing less. Might we be having this discussion if I’d written about fairies? Probably not, but I know less about those than I do about guns.

Ah yes, back to guns.

If by chance then, you are from one of those illustrious government agencies, I want you to know, I fully respect the brave and honourable service you perform in safeguarding our nation, both here and overseas. I’m not here to question what you do, or indeed, how or why. The world is irrefutably, a safer place with you in it. So, if you do want to read, listen, watch, track, or hack my progress, knock yourself out, but you should probably know, our paths may very well cross again, because where those guns are concerned, I’m sticking to them. I am going to keep on writing.

Oh, and I owe you an apology for the one-fingered salute. I’m usually a far more polite person than this might suggest, but… you did stalk me, along a deserted, country lane, in the dark, and late at night… just saying.

Since you’re here, I wonder if I could ask a small favour. As I inadvertently, appear to have knocked on your door, do you think, when you have a spare moment, you know, while rummaging through my file drawers, you might have a little read of my novel and let me know if I’ve got all those specialist little details, i.e. my FACTS right? It’s just that… well, I’m guessing you might just be the kind of people who would know.

Cheeky ask, I know, but it really does come from a good place, a genuine wish to write truly, credible FICTION.


Thank you!




What’s wrong with clichés?

August 25, 2019

What is a cliché?  It’s simply a phrase or saying in frequent usage, easily recognised and understood.  We use them all the time in conversation and avoiding them would result in a rather affected manner of speaking.

Writers become deeply concerned about clichés and see them as a deadly sin.  And yet in our newspapers, we find them scattered like confetti – that’s a cliché by the way, but we all know what it means.  I could have said that they are to be found randomly distributed within the text of most newspaper articles.   But scattered like confetti is much more visual.  It has been over-used for a reason.  It’s been over-used because it has meaning.

I wonder why we have all become so super sensitive about clichés.  Perhaps it’s the fault of the professional and non-professional critiquer.  It’s so easy to pick one out of an excellent piece of writing and say disparagingly, “a pity about that cliché in the first sentence.”  To me one cliché on a page is nothing to get upset about.  It’s when there’s one in every paragraph that it can become distracting.

A particular cliché can become irritating when it gets too much exposure.  Politicians are guilty of using expressions like “hard working families” until the phrase begins to lose its meaning.   Too many clichés can be indicative of sloppy or lazy writing.  It can mean the writer hasn’t taken the trouble to seek out a more original or apt analogy.  However, avoiding them altogether can result in writing that is less explicit and less accessible. Certainly clichés should be allowed their place in dialogue because an attempt at eliminating them will result in conversation that is stiff and wordy.

Writing is all about communication and as long as we are communicating in a way that the reader understands, it’s serving its purpose.   We all know not to judge a book by its cover and that it’s little use flogging a dead horse.  How sad if writers were to avoid these picturesque expressions and allow them to die out of common usage.  Sometimes it’s possible to be too clever by half!

These expressions are a sort of shorthand.  They say a lot in a few words.  We shouldn’t sneer at the hard-working cliché when it is conveying exactly what we want to say.   Of course, we should look for new and original ways of expressing what we mean, but beware, if successful, that clever phrase may soon become a cliché.


The Mislaid Art of Storytelling

July 2, 2019

It’s July of 2019. If you’re reading this blog, you can likely write creatively. You’re probably thinking about writing a novel, or you’re already writing one. At some point, some way down the line, at the back of your mind, you’re probably thinking it might get published.

The chances of that are very high in the era of 2019. You have various options. The least likely is traditional publishing, although you will spend a disproportionate amount of time pursuing it.

If you want your book available to a broad audience rather than ignored by a few, to own a real physical copy of your book, then indie is an option.

Whether you are going traditional or indie, there is one crucial detail you will probably mislay along the way which is story, or rather good storytelling.

There are two types of book writers in my experience, and you can work out which you are by how you describe what you’re doing. If you’re writing a novel, congratulations, you are among the 99.8% of writers who can write, who have a great idea but are unable to give that idea to an audience, and by give I mean make it an entertaining story. Call it stubborn, ego, apathy, self-interest, insecurity or a lack of insight.

If you’re a writer who believes you’re telling a story and the only thing that matters is the wider audience, then you’re very rare. It has to be said neither is more likely to be successful, but one is more likely to entertain an audience.

So how do you become a storyteller over a novel writer? The first step is to realise what an audience expect from a story, in a nutshell, they want to know:

The world and timeframe, to be hooked by dynamic characters very quickly, to understand the story stakes and dramatic theme.

What is the false goal the characters pursue during the extraordinary journey that has them fall in love and discover hidden qualities and even a few nasty traits? What forces them to take control in the middle of the story, what truth do they learn fighting increasing odds, in the face of despair and even death?

How do they use this uncertain truth to face the bad guys, and how does the conflict resolve? How does the theme punch you emotionally, have you thinking about the characters after the credits or the last page has turned?

If a story doesn’t deliver all this, the audience instinctively knows something is missing without necessarily knowing what that something is. As a fully paid-up member of the audience, how will you know your novel is hitting the required marks as a storyteller, as an author?

I thought you’d never ask.

If I tell you story requires structure you will roll your eyes. I know, right! You’re creating art! You’re not writing to a formula!

Let’s consider whether you would buy from an artist who visibly doesn’t understand the foundations of composition? Or from a musician who audibly doesn’t understand the principles of rhythm?

The problem with novel writing is that our entry point is an ability to write well, we’re well educated, the page to page works, it’s misleading. Our broader perspective of story is built on a lifetime spent as a consumer. It’s instinctive.

It should be no surprise to discover telling a good story is as challenging to master as fine art or good music. While a few take to it naturally, 99.8% of us will have to graft to gain insight.

Getting hold of the right material to learn from can be confusing, there are a lot of people ready to take your money, a whole bunch of books to buy. I would buy just two:

Blake Snyder’s Save the Cat (great for the essential structure)

K.M. Weiland’s Creating Character Arcs: The Masterful Author’s Guide to Uniting Story structure, plot and character development (the absolute reference for blending everything else).

Then understanding story structure and character arc is just the beginning, seeing it implemented across a broad scope of fiction is necessary to build our storytellers muscle memory, our point of reference.

These past few years, I’ve been doing just that, breaking down story to gain insight into how it’s put together. The last year I’ve been figuring how best to breakdown a story as a video, to learn and share that knowledge. I think I’m getting there.

The first video is linked below: Monsters Inc. The breakdown is on YouTube. It’s free. You’re welcome.

You don’t have to be mad to be a writer…

June 1, 2019

I haven’t really talked about what happened to me back in December 2017.

It’s taken me quite some time (and quite a bit of therapy) to work it out for myself which means I can now cut to the chase and tell you that I had a breakdown. I was signed off work for three months with depression and spent another three months gradually building back up to working full time.

During most of 2017 I wrote not a word, save vomiting up the odd sanity preserving (or so I thought) piece of flash fiction. Each was a little darker than the last. Each a little harder to write.

Just before Christmas 2017 I started counselling with a fantastic lady called Julie.

For six weeks I cried like I have never cried before.

Crying is underrated – it’s incredibly cathartic.

Julie asked me what I wanted to get out of her sessions – I didn’t have an immediate answer, but eventually we got to the point where I knew what I wanted. I wanted my head to be empty of the noise that filled my quiet place and I wanted to be able to write again.

It seemed impossible. I could not see how I would ever find my quiet place again, my brain a constant, torturing buzz of angst and doubt and failure.

Julie knew I had my writer’s retreat just after our penultimate session together. Somehow, she got me to a place where the noise was at least subdued. A slim chance that I might be able to write something at the retreat. I didn’t know what, just something…

I decided that I was going to try and write a story for the Fantastic Books Publishing Fire and Ice Fantasy Anthology Competition. Somewhere, amongst the dusty shelves of stories long abandoned and jars filled with the pickled remnants of old ideas there was a flicker of life. There was an old story, a really old story, that was the seed for a novel that I started when I was sixteen (but never finished), joined WordWatchers twelve years ago intending to resurrect (I never have). It was a story about Fire and Ice and, to get away from the buzz, I went back to my childhood quiet place and there was the story – dusty, tatty, neglected, but still alive, waiting for some love and attention.

So, amazingly, I wrote that story. I’m a much better writer now and I wrote the 1500 words over the weekend and was confident enough to read it out to the rest of the group on our last night at the retreat. We literally told stories around a roaring fire…

The story was well received, sensible suggestions were made. Edits were duly undertaken and then, with nothing to lose, I submitted it to the competition …

… then … nothing. Months, indeed a year went by before I found out story had indeed made the longlist for the anthology. I waited with baited breath – would I make the final cut? It would take a couple more months, but yes, I would be in the anthology.

My edits came back from the FBP’s editors at the end of April. They were reasonable and very doable. Unfortunately they arrived exactly when I was also struggling with my mental health again. I procrastinated for a whole month. Eventually I begged for, and was granted a one week extension to the deadline for the return of the edits and, reminding myself of something important I had promised myself, I finished the edits one Saturday morning a few weeks ago.

So, that’s it. The Anthology ‘The Forge’ will be available in early August 2019, over 18 months since I wrote, ‘Elemental Sacrifice’.

I’ll be buying the usual number of copies to have on the bookshelf at home, but I’ll be buying two extra copies – one for my GP who has been amazing during the last 18 months (and only discovered I was a writer during our more in-depth heart-to-hearts in his surgery) and, of course, a copy for Julie, who got me writing again, when I truly believed such a thing was not possible.

Before I go, I’d also like to say that I could not have done any of this without the support of my amazing family and without my brilliant friends in WordWatchers.

I love you all.

Last week (at time of writing) it was Mental Health Awareness Week – but every week should be Mental Health Awareness Week – we don’t talk about it enough, it comes with all sorts of negative connotations, but, at the end of the day, Mental Health is just ‘Health’.

Take care of yourself and, as always, thank you for your time.

John Hoggard










UPDATE (24th July 2019): ‘The Forge: Fire and Ice’ was released on July 14th in Paperback: http://www.wordwatchers.net/books/the-forge-fire-and-ice/ 

Author John Hoggard is smiling while holding up a copy of the Sci-Fan Anthology 'The Forge: Fire and Ice'

‘The Forge: Fire and Ice’

How to Deliver a Writer’s Group Critique (as painlessly as possible without losing the message).

May 7, 2019

This is a wry but honest series of observations on the peculiarities of human behaviour that sometimes distract us from the true path of offering good advice to other writers. Frankly, there are as many opinions of how to do this properly as there are members of my group, but this is my take.

Delivering a good critique is not all about nailing all the defects in a piece of writing. Everyone is different, and how person on the end of the critique will receive this information should determine the way it is delivered. So, as well as being experts at communicating ideas to on the page, we need to use emotional intelligence to determine the best way to deliver the critique to someone we probably know well.

There are all too human quirks that we all possess to some degree that need some attenuation to deliver a good critique. Most of these are traits that I have observed in myself, both in giving and receiving critiques. It is useful to identify the tell-tale signs in terms of their outward manifestation so that we can identify these tendencies in ourselves as we slide over the rim of the fiery pit of self-indulgence!

Receiving the critique is like having red-hot coals inserted into your brain. Receiving a critique is nonetheless a good thing. How can this be? The trick is to listen to what’s being said, establish exactly what the critiquer is saying, then move on. This is easier said than done. I’ve observed mature and well-adjusted people either close to tears or wailing in despair (mostly me) during this process, so it’s important to remember what it’s all for.

No matter how perfect we think our story is, it’s quite likely that unless we’re God’s-Gift to the literary world, there will be many issues that need attention. The aim is for a group of writers, used to searching for errors in their work, to do the same with our own work. If they are doing their job properly, they will find a lot of areas of concern. There are two reasons for this: we will have become overfamiliar with our own work, and also because their strengths and weaknesses will be different to ours. This applies equally to published writers and those of us still toiling in the foothills.

Critiquing in a writers’ group follows two principle pathways: a considered written review and a discussion face to face. However, both methodologies are susceptible to being handled badly by the unprepared critiquer and critiquee. The individual being critiqued needs to be aware of the potential pitfall of not being receptive to criticism, in which case all the hard work of the rest of the group will have been in vain. Equally important though is the need for those delivering the critique to fulfil the primary objective of this process: to assist with improving the work of the recipient. What can interfere with this process?

Let’s deal with the most obvious and overarching problem: to forget that the objective is to help the recipient. The job is not to merely find fault, but to pick out the areas that need attention, and present them in a way that will help the writer to improve. Bombarding the writer with a blizzard of petty faults  will not help this process; they’ll just switch off and move on to the next issue. Far better to pick out one or two glaring examples. This principle applies to writing defects large and small, but you’re wasting your time by flagging them all up without supplying underpinning evidence.

But this is not about what, specifically, these individual faults might be…

All common sense, you might say, but if we drill deeper, what areas get in the way of following this simple principle? The answer is, unsurprisingly, human nature.

When we start to review another person’s work, one emotion we experience is relief. It is our opportunity to remind ourselves that others in the group are human after all. If not properly checked, this relief can give way to overconfidence: the conviction that surely this evidence of fallibility must be the result of one’s superior writing skills. The horses are then in danger of bolting in the direction of showcasing one’s own skills, rather than gently guiding the perhaps fragile ego of the recipient in the right direction! Rather like the Roman Emperors of glory past, we need to have a slave standing on the footplate of our chariots whispering in our ears to remind us that we are merely human.

Character clashes can get in the way of delivering an objective critique. There seems to be no such thing as a generic writing personality: we are as diverse as the society we occupy. As a result, we might enter into the process with a preconceived notion of the kind of faults we are looking for and our comments can be coloured by our view of the individual. This also works in reverse, of course, and we might be susceptible to judging a friends work more favourably. Whilst this is common practice in the book endorsement world, we should try to hold ourselves above such pettiness. We are not helping our friends by giving a ringing endorsement to a book that everyone else judges as flawed. Furthermore, that friend will not be able to trust you to deliver an objective view on later critiques.

Some purists, be they of grammar, history, logical consistency, or setting out on the page, become overheated in the process of reviewing a piece of work. We are usually out of our comfort-zone, not only in terms of writing style, but also of genre. As a result, quite naturally, the process of hacking though unrelenting pages that we are not necessarily enjoying, generate a tension. If we then encounter one or more problems in the course of reviewing the work, our language can become more emotive and more combative.

Closely related, and perhaps linked to the above, is the critique that’s been completed with a side order of beer/whisky/Merlot: name your brew. The symptoms are similar to the foregoing and can slide further towards hyperbole as the evening progresses. Yes, I do like a drink now and again!

These problems can be easily be remedied once we acknowledge they can potentially exist. We have an obligation to do the best job we can for the others in the writing group. As someone said to me recently, it is a high complement just for someone to want to read your work, whatever the basis. The simple solution to all these problems is to reread and edit before sending.

None of this relieves the recipient of the responsibility of intelligently interpreting the critique, no matter how painful the process. Very few people will undertake a critique with the intention of doing anything other than giving good and helpful advice.

As a worst-case scenario, I have read, though not personally experienced, instances of what I call the nil-sum reviewer. Such people populate the internet, especially online review sites and chat-rooms. I have heard stories about such a person in a writing group saying to another “Well if you managed to get that published, then we’re all in with a chance”. The objective here was denigrate others work in order to elevate his or her own. The giveaway here is when the reviewer leads with a value laden judgement of the piece, clearly designed to have an emotional impact rather than something to help the recipient.

Each member of the group will learn from the experience of critiquing. The process of spotting problems within a piece of writing serves to consolidate our existing understanding of writing techniques, as well as affording the opportunity to learn a few new tricks in the area where the subject writer excels. Critiquing work is therefore as much a part of the normal writing day as much as any other work production.

The vital final stage of submitting a critique is to re-read, especially the inline comments, on a later occasion. Have I been heavy handed in communicating that point? Am I needlessly using emotive language in putting that point across? Do the comments I’ve made represent my overall view of the MS – is the criticism proportionate? It only takes a few extra minutes to carry out this check. Overriding all of this is the consideration that you are helping the subject of the review, not airing your own knowledge or trying to identify every single error. To forget this simple principle risks doing more harm than good.

Good writing is not undertaken fearfully. The imagination of good writer is uninhibited and the ideas will flow directly onto the page unencumbered by self-doubt or the fear of harsh criticism. The overall objective of a writer’s critique is to improve the quality of the subjects writing by offering constructive advice. Clearly, the critique has to be honest, even if that means delivering unexpectedly bad news. But the tone and method of that message is key to the difference between a good and a bad critique.


Oliver Randle

7 May 2019

Fiction Therapy

April 7, 2019

Long before I started writing fiction, I was aware of the therapeutic benefits of writing, particularly for someone like me who is not quick thinking and articulate.  It takes me time to put words together and by then the opportunity to speak them may have passed.


I first started to understand how it could be therapeutic for other people when I worked for a number of years for a boss who had an unfortunate habit of always speaking his mind.  Some saw this as a virtue, but it didn’t always make him friends.  However, outspoken remarks can be glossed over, re-interpreted and explained.  The written word is less forgiving.


It became a problem when a letter came into the office that contained a complaint.  He found any criticism difficult to cope with.   ‘Let me draft something for you’ I would say.


‘No, no need.  I can reply to this’.  He would take it away and cover several sheets with angry scribble, pressing so hard that his words punctured the paper.  The sheets would then be put on my desk for typing.  ‘This is what I want to say and I don’t want you to change anything.’


Having read through the pages of vitriol, I would set about drafting a response that took quite a different approach, one that would promote better understanding while avoiding antagonising the recipient.  He always signed without a murmur and once it was in the post, I could shred the closely written sheets.


This made me recognise how important it was to him to be able to write down his feelings, but how equally important it was to be careful how these words were shared.


When I started writing fiction, I realised what a perfect vehicle it is for feelings and emotions that can’t otherwise be easily expressed.


Fictional characters almost always develop from real life models.  The unpleasant characters are sometimes the easiest to create.  When I shared my first novel with work colleagues, one of my characters made them fall about laughing.  This was not because the character was in any way amusing, but because they recognised the source.  I had been on the receiving end of this person’s unpleasantness many times and writing the character had given me great satisfaction.  Perhaps I shouldn’t have given him a name and occupation so similar to the model.  I’ve now changed a few non-essentials, but kept the essence of this character’s unpleasant nature.  Every story needs a villain or two. Another aspect of writing villains is that you have to explore what makes them the way they are.  This can bring greater understanding and even empathy.


The characters closest to the writer tend to have something of the writer in them.  They are the characters that the writers may use to express their own emotions, feelings and views.  Probably they will have some personal enhancements that the writer quite fancies.  They may be bigger and stronger or prettier and more agile.   Almost certainly, they will be more articulate, able to express themselves exactly as the writer would wish.


One of the great things about writing fiction is the opportunity it provides for exploration.  This can be the exploration of relationships or the environment.


Most of my writing has involved the exploration of relationships.  We all want to know what makes other people tick. Once you place one character you have created in the vicinity of another and allow them to interact, the result can be quite unexpected.  As you start to ask the big ‘what if’ question, you can allow your characters to act out your deepest anxieties and desires without any real life bloodshed.  It can be a very liberating experience and teach you a lot about human nature and incidentally about yourself.


Exploring the environment is something else.  Perhaps you have longed to travel to other countries or closer to home to see what’s behind the door of that house half way down the street that doesn’t seem to fit in with all the other houses.  You can send your fictional character on a journey to find out more.  If your own street seems a bit dull, then you can carry this to extremes and build a whole other world. If you hate the political system, you can make up your own and find out how it could work.  The possibilities are endless and may help to reconcile you to life as it is on planet earth.


You could start by collecting stories.  They really are all around you and people use them in all sorts of ways.  There may only be seven basic stories, but the variations are limitless. You only have to listen to a television debate or be present at a business meeting and sooner or later someone will come up with a story. It may not start ‘once upon a time’, but you will learn recognise the various openings that people use.  It will probably be a story that has been told a million times and each time it has been embroidered a little to make it more amusing or more interesting or to hammer home a point.  Names may have been changed to protect the innocent or not so innocent. It has become more fiction than fact so that in the end the two may be difficult to separate.


Most children are able to escape into imaginary worlds when the going becomes tough in this one.  At school we are encouraged to write stories.  As we get older and life becomes more serious, many of us lose this ability.  Day dreaming has no place in an adult world obsessed with facts and figures.  Perhaps fiction therapy could help people unlock this under-used area of the brain and find fulfilment in creativity.

Photograph of Pam Pheasant

Pam Pheasant

Post Retreat

February 3, 2019

So, it is Sunday February 3rd. One week ago it was our last night at Mill House Retreat in Devon.

Mill House Retreat

The fire was roaring and we gathered in the main room to talk and to read. We talked about lots of interesting technical things related to writing. The use of the passive voice, the five act structure, our plans for the group in the year ahead…

Then we each agreed to read something to the rest of the group that we had written over the weekend. I think this is my favourite part of the weekend.

Pam got us going, reading a beautiful piece about using writing as therapy. As somebody who has a child who has used ‘art therapy’ as a coping mechanism for their anxiety and depression, Pam’s reading really resonated with me. I really hope you she turns it into a blog and you get to read it too, because it’s wonderful.

I’m not sure who went next, but I think it was Julian, who read from a new chapter on his current WIP that he’s been working on while on the Curtis Brown Course in London for the last six months. It was a wonderful insight into how the novel has developed since we critiqued it as a group last year. I like the change in direction and the reasons Julian has made it. There was some feedback from the group – positive plus some suggestions that Julian said he would take away and ponder.

I will pretend Helen went next who read from something very new for her – a children’s story. Written from scratch over the weekend. At 1200 words long, she read the whole story out and it was engaging and fun and we can all see the potential for a long running series of stories from this single idea. It was great to hear Helen doing something new in the run up to her starting a new writing course with her main WIP.

I think I might have gone next – I read three pieces of Flash Fiction I’d written/rewritten/remastered from snippets of ideas I had trapped in the amber of my 75-word stories that I often submit to Paragraph Planet. All were well received, I particularly liked Helen’s reaction to my final story about a werewolf. The thought of her expression will have me smiling for a long time to come. Of course the group made some very sensible suggestions and I edited the stories the following morning (just before leaving the retreat) and two days later I had submitted the entire Flash Fiction Anthology to the competition I’d been hoping to enter.

I have to say here that trying to chose from well over 150 pieces of flash fiction and then to down select, re-edit, re-write or just abandon some, to make what I hope is a coherent collection of Flash Fiction was much harder than I thought it would be. And, other than this blog, I haven’t written a word since I submitted the collection, as my tank of creativity is empty and only filling slowly.

Right – back to the evening. John Potter read next (I’m pretty sure). He gave us a chapter that contained a thrilling, fast paced fight scene from his futuristic but low-tech WIP. The group’s only criticism of the piece was that the fight was a little too long. John agreed and, like me, editing that section before he too, finally departed the retreat the next day.

Finally, Maurice, who has put himself in the unenviable position of having two novel writing projects on the go. The piece he read out that evening was from the first novel he started. As ever, Maurice is the master storyteller, he has a knack in both his writing and reading to spin you a yarn that on one level is somehow filled with the mundane and yet is absolutely real and engrossing. I’m really looking forward to reading the whole novel when it’s finished.

So, that’s it – a blog written almost as quickly as the weekend seemed to pass.

I am very lucky to be in such an amazing group and to feel completely safe reading to them (something that I had only finished a few minutes before reading it!), knowing that an points or criticisms will be aimed entirely at making the story better.

Mill House Retreats is a balm for the bruised writer’s soul and ego. It also seems to do the group as a whole a great deal of good too – we always seem to leave more invigorated, keener, with just a smidgen more self-belief our unofficial tagline – ‘Serious about Writing’.

WordWatchers pose for a group photo on our last evening of our retreat.


A retreat, but no surrender

January 19, 2019

This time next week I will be at Mill House Retreat a beautiful old house in Devon. This will be the second time we will have been there and almost exactly a year since we were there last. Sometimes it’s hard to believe that a year has really gone past. In some ways, so much has changed, and in others so little…

In the month before the last retreat, a few weeks before Christmas, I finally admitted that I had depression. It was not the Christmas present I had been expecting. I was off work and at my lowest ebb. I had stopped writing and I didn’t see the point in going to the retreat.

My family and my fellow WordWatchers were amazing, they rallied round and got me to the retreat. The atmosphere of Mill House was calming and soothing and over the weekend I tentatively started to write again – unsure if I actually had a story in me – but at least willing to give it a go.

I wrote a story, themed around ‘fire and ice’ for a competition that my publisher, Fantastic Books Publishing, was running at the time. I wrote the story – I read it out to my fellow WordWatchers on our final evening, sitting round a roaring fire. I could not have asked for a better scene, atmosphere or audience. Responses to the story were positive, suggestions to tweak it were insightful and were, over the next week or so, made.

I submitted the story.

It was long listed.

I was as surprised as I was delighted. I could still write!

The story is currently in a state of limbo since FBP haven’t announced how many of the long listed stories will actually make it into the Anthology. I really hope I do make it into the anthology, not for me, not really, but because I told my counsellor that I just wanted to write again. She helped me achieve that. I’d really like to present her with a copy, as a thank-you, for being my guide from the darkness back into the light.

So, throughout 2018 I ‘ticked over’ – low dose antidepressants, practising my CBT (Cognitive Behavioural Therapy) and lots of walking. I presumed I was doing OK. I wasn’t writing much, but I had several short stories accepted for publication and I had half a dozen 75-worders published on Paragraph Planet.

I took a chunk of November and all of December off work to spend time with my family, in particular my wife, Vee, who was recovering from major spinal surgery. I mostly ignored work, I cut back on my time on Facebook (and was so much better for doing so) and we, as a family, had a lovely Christmas.

I returned to work at the beginning of January to discover, in my absence, a course that I ran, that had been cancelled the year before, was no longer cancelled and that I had less than a month to get it organised to be run again. That’s when I discovered that depression, like many other illnesses, isn’t cured, it just goes into remission. I felt overwhelmed again, heard the little voices whispering the excuses I could make to not go to work today, or not even get out of bed.

I went back to my GP immediately. We had a really good chat. He doubled my antidepressants (still a low dose, but, also, still doubled) and wants me to get a refresher on my CBT, to make sure I haven’t picked up any bad habits over the last year.

So, here we are again. The WordWatchers retreat is upon us and I’m depressed again. I’m nowhere near as unwell as I was last year and I’m much better equipped to cope, but this blog is the most I’ve written in several months. So, I have set myself a target. There’s a flash fiction anthology competition being run by EllipsisZine which has a closing date a few days after the retreat. I intend to enter that competition.

Wish me luck! I think I might need it.

As ever, I thank-you for your time.

John Hoggard

National Flash Fiction Day

June 16, 2018

This isn’t actually a blog, which, considering how long it has been since any member of WordWatchers wrote a blog, that’s rather embarrassing, however, that’s a discussion for another day.

Today, June 16th, is National Flash Fiction Day – or it is, here in the UK – and looking a the links to the flood of tweets with that or the #NFFD hastag on Twitter has been a delight to follow.

So, this all ties in rather nicely with the fact that I recently submitted 3 drabbles to a new Science Fiction magazine, The Martian Magazine and the editor, Eric Fomley, chose one of them to be included in the forthcoming run of the magazine. He’s actually paying for the stories too – 10¢ a word, so my 100 word drabble is worth $10. It’s been a while since I was actually paid for my writing and I forgot what a lovely feeling you get from the phrase ‘I’ll send a contract over’ appearing in an email. Also, because Eric is actually paying for work, he’s trying to raise funds with an Indiegogo campaign, so he can publishing more stories, more often and pay more writers for their efforts.

So, I have two ‘spare’ drabbles and I have decided that today, of all days, would be a perfectly reasonable day to share them.




I hope.

It’s a Dangerous Place


Somewhere en route between the Earth and Moon a transport shuttle transmits the briefest of Mayday calls. Two rescue ships power away from the nearest orbital station and head for its last known position.

Against the pinpricked blackness of space, a bloom of orange appears. It expands like the time-lapsed swelling of a mushroom cap. Moments later ribbons of swirling fire erupt from the perfect sphere. They are as beautiful as they are deadly.

The fires flare and fade to nothing. Sensors indicate that there is nothing left to be rescued.

The ships return to dock, crews offering silent prayers.

Life on Mars


The shutter winds noisily upwards, filling the small, metallic room with a pale, red light. I glance at the clock beside the bed noting both Earth and Martian time. The sun is already quite high in the sky, but it’s still early morning for the base as we slowly become accustomed to the length of a day here.

It used to be strange, thinking that I would die on Mars, but I look to my side, where Rachel still sleeps, and I realise I will live here, and eventually, like all humans, no matter where they are, I will die.


As ever, thank you for your time,

John Hoggard

Next Page »

The Palace of Lost Dreams

Charlotte Betts, 7th Novel has been shortlisted for the RNA 2019 'Best Historical Romantic Novel'.

Read more »

‘Forging ahead…’

The ForgeWW member John Hoggard's short story 'Elemental Sacrifice' features in the Science Fiction & Fantasy Anthology 'The Forge: Fire and Ice', which was released in July 2019.

Read more »

Creative Writing Escapes

CWECreative Writing Escapes

WW member Charlotte Betts and former member Danielle Auld have something wonderful to offer you.

Cleared for launch!

Elite Encounters Elite Encounters is a Role-Playing Game set in the Elite: Dangerous Universe and is the work of David 'Selezen Lake' Hughes. It features drabbles from John Hoggard.

Read more »

How to survive a critique


WordWatchers is reviewing one full novel a month. By the end of 2017, it will have critiqued 7 novels. 5yrs after she wrote it, Abbie's blog about the process is still very relevant.

Read more »

Recent Posts

@WordWatchers Twitter

Follow @WordWatchers on twitter.